“CAPA’S LAW”
In Memory of my
Deceased Pet Capa
Note
that this is not a mandatory spay to retain pet ownership
suggestion. Others can cover that question. This is to make
mandatory the dispensing of a very brief statement of warning by
shelters and rescue groups about mammary cancer prevention. Very
little effort is involved and virtually zero cost! Additionally
this is no effort to break low income persons out of pet ownership by
fines/costs they cannot cover!
1) Pets picked up by city animal
control agencies more than one time and determined to not be
spayed/neutered should result in owners, if wishing to maintain
non-sterilized status, being required to pay an increased annual
“pet tax” city fee of $25 to $35 more per annum than the
usual discounted fee for complied spay-neuter status. There
should be no resistance on the part of municipalities to this
proposal. It would enhance their funding; pets would live longer
resulting in more annual city fees; and more people would spay/neuter
extending their pets lives. Those choosing to not spay/neuter
would be told the modestly increased fee goes to subsidize spay neuter
cost for hardship residents. Many cities already may have such a
framework in place. If lawmakers can adjust the suggestion in a
positive manner, please do so. The bar must not be set high to
satisfy hardship status.
Addenda to #1--- Some cities
(Dallas) already have near mandatory spay neuter ordinances and special
exemptions with specific fees. An attempt at state level was made
some years ago to impose a $300 yearly fee for non-altered
status. As long as such fee can be maintained at $50 yearly or
less, it shouldn’t be considered heavy handed. My view
only. I am not suggesting the State should dictate to
municipalities as to fee amounts; however, a discount of $5 to $15 per
annum for spay-neuter positive is an ineffective prompt.
Exemptions will always be available to breeders and those involved in
the dog show circuit. Numbers #2 and #3 following are the
backbone, heart and soul of what needs to be happening all across Texas!
2) Official city
animal control agency notices mailed to pet owners annually regarding
rabies shot status and yearly “dog tax” should add a one
sentence caution to pet owners to the effect of “Unspayed females
are at increased risk of mammary cancer and uterine infections both of
which may become fatal.” Another line should be added
urging pet owners to have pets examined once or twice yearly as
veterinarians can catch early stage situations nonprofessionals would
miss. Add whatever wording is deemed appropriate concerning male
dogs. Naturally cats are included in the message which should so
state.
3) All Texas based pet
rescue and adoption groups, non breed specific and breed specific and
spay neuter specific organizations, especially if IRS recognized as
501c3 tax exempt status, must be required to state online in their
websites that spay isn’t for overpopulation only, but to avoid
cancer and infection hazards. If they have printed literature as
in adoption agreements or other literature, this warning notice must
also be included there.
4) All spay neuter organizations must mention spay for mammary cancer
and uterine infection prevention and not overpopulation only.
This only necessitates a very few more words! It will make more
adopters comfortable about not being able to adopt a breedable pet; it
will additionally serve to educate site visitors who may have a
non-altered pet that their pet is at increased health hazard risk and
prompt them to take action. There is no excuse for not adding
this TINY
amount of additional effort to bring more uninformed pet owners into
the information loop. The cost of implementing this educational
measure is in most cases, only a few minutes time of site
maintenance! The printed text necessary for this public
educational measure is so small as to seldom require so much as even
one additional page!
5) Veterinary check up
and vaccination notices, usually mailed annually, should feature a
warning about cancer and infections in pets not altered. See my
letter of appeal in the main body of my email to you for cooperation to
review positive evidence that veterinarians wouldn’t be against
this.
6) Penalties for
non-compliance. Beyond the fact that noncompliance should invoke
a guilty conscience, I leave this specific to the writers of the
legislative bill. I would however suggest if 501c3 groups refuse
to warn the public via TRIFLING website addition about mammary cancer
and uterine infections in unspayed pets, the Internal Revenue Service
should be notified and review their tax exempt standing! Please
contact your national members of Congress with this mandatory provision
for retention of tax exempt status for private pet rescue and adoption
placement groups. There is no excuse for concealing from the
public what they have a right to know to make informed decision on
their pets future, especially when it can be stated in 20 words or
less!
Again note there is no exercise in hair splitting going on because spay
to prevent too many pets automatically covers spay for other good
reasons---it’s about making EDUCATION AVAILABLE to any UNINFORMED
site visitors who may have unspayed/neutered pets are aren’t
aware of any cancer/infection RISKS!
Charles Savoie
Capa’s Canine
Mammary Cancer Project
After this initial burst of enthusiasm, BOBOSKY and all her “ha-ha” associates refused any further response!
What was it Lee Marvin
said in “The Dirty Dozen” (1967)? “I’m
interested in results, not embroidery!”
It isn’t the good they’ve done, but what they won’t do, which is inexplicable!
It is NOT OK to let dogs die of mammary cancer when preventable via
a simple public educational campaign costing next to nothing!
Note this was sent in her official capacity as an official of an
IRS registered 501(c)4 group, whose activities are public!
Since my BITTER encounter with this SHAM group, I
discovered they stood AGAINST the Companion
Animal Protection Act which would give
better treatment to Texas pets!
LEGAL
NOTICE: This consumer advocacy
website – www.texaspetprotect.org
- is intended as an information website only. This website is NOT
associated in
any way with the Texas Humane Legislation Network. The
www.texaspetprotect.org
website makes no warranty as to the accuracy, completeness, reliability
or
fitness for a particular use of the information on this website. This
information is ADVISORY ONLY & the website user assumes all
liability &
waives any & all claims or causes of action against this
website, its
authors, webmaster, and its hosts for all uses of, and any reliance
on, this
information. This website specifically disclaims any & all
liability for
any claims or damages that may result from providing this
website
or the information it contains. This paragraph shall accompany all
distributions of this information & is incorporated into this
information
for all purposes.